A Lab Timed 56 Students Watching TikTok. On Average, They Guessed Long, Not Short.
The Wall Street Journal says teens are losing their sense of time to TikTok and Instagram this week. The one controlled experiment that actually tested that claim found something messier, and a separate one-year study of 1,567 teenagers points to a different kind of time that is really eroding.
By Sana Whitfield, Culture, Science & Life
· 4 min read · Updated

Key Takeaways
- •The only controlled experiment that timed people watching short video found a 21 percent overestimate on a 5 minute 23 second task, the opposite of the popular 'time flies' complaint (Behavioral Sciences, 2025, 56 college students).
- •A year long study of 1,567 Chinese high schoolers, led by Guanxing Xiong at South China Normal University, found heavy short video use eroded 'future time perspective,' which in turn predicted weaker academic buoyancy.
- •Meta agreed in August 2026 to pay up to 18 billion dollars settling claims from 47 states, and will cap teen use of Instagram and Facebook at a default 2 hours a day.
- •Pew Research Center found about 1 in 5 of 1,458 U.S. teens surveyed in late 2025 say they are on TikTok almost constantly, averaging 1 hour 18 minutes a day, the most of any platform measured.
Twenty eight college students in Suzhou, China, sat down for a psychology experiment that sounds almost too simple to publish. Researchers handed them a phone, told them to watch five minutes and twenty three seconds of short videos, and asked one question when the clip ended: how long do you think that just took?
The guesses ran long, not short. On average, participants in the 2025 study from Soochow University and Anhui Normal University put the task at about 21 percent longer than its actual length, a statistically significant overshoot that runs opposite the usual complaint about short form video, that it erases time without anyone noticing.
21%
average overestimate of a 5-minute, 23-second short video task
t(27) = 2.458, p = 0.021, among 28 college students in the short-duration group. A separate 16-minute version of the same task showed no significant distortion.
That finding sits awkwardly next to a story The Wall Street Journal published this week, headlined 'Teens Who Can't Put Down TikTok and Instagram Are Losing Their Sense of Time.' The Journal's reporting draws on a different, larger body of research and quotes Dr. Vera Feuer, chief clinical officer at the Child Mind Institute, on why teenagers struggle more than adults with exactly this kind of trade off.
“We know young people have difficulty with patience, tolerating frustration and delaying gratification.”
Feuer's point centers on the prefrontal cortex, the brain region that handles planning and impulse control and does not finish developing until the mid twenties. Teenagers are working with less of that machinery than the college students in the lab study, which is part of why some researchers have stopped asking how long five minutes feels and started asking a bigger question instead.
The real finding might not be about the clock at all
A separate, far larger study published this year in Computers in Human Behavior followed 1,567 first year high school students in eastern China for a full year, surveying them three times, six months apart. The team, led by Guanxing Xiong at South China Normal University, was not measuring how long five minutes felt. It was tracking something called future time perspective, a person's ability to connect what they do right now to where it leads later.
Students with heavier short video habits lost ground on that measure over the course of the year, and the drop mattered beyond the videos themselves. Future time perspective predicted academic buoyancy, the researchers' term for a student's ability to shake off a bad test grade or a confusing lesson and keep going. Lose the sense that today connects to some later point, and an ordinary school setback starts to feel bigger than it is.
The short answer
The one lab test that actually timed people watching short video found they overestimated, not lost, five minutes, the opposite of the popular complaint. A separate year long study of 1,567 Chinese teenagers found a more durable effect: heavy short video use eroded their sense of connection between today's choices and tomorrow's outcomes, which made ordinary school setbacks harder to recover from.
Neither study is the last word. The time distortion experiment ran on 56 college students in a single sitting, not teenagers living their daily lives, and the authors noted participants could potentially glance at their own phone's clock mid task. The year long study is correlational by design. It cannot prove short video use causes the drop in future thinking rather than following from it, and its authors flagged that a competitive Chinese high school system may not generalize to classrooms elsewhere.
What is already changing because of research like this
Policy is not waiting for a replication. In August, Meta agreed to pay up to 18 billion dollars to settle claims from 47 states over how Instagram and Facebook affected young users, one of the largest consumer settlements of the year, according to PBS NewsHour's coverage of the deal.
- A default two hour daily limit across Instagram and Facebook that teens cannot turn off without a parent's permission
- A new night mode blocking Feed, Stories, Explore, and Reels between midnight and 6 a.m., though direct messages still work
- No push notifications during weekday school hours
- New limits on social comparison features such as visible like counts
The limits target exactly the platform most implicated in this kind of research. TikTok is the single most time intensive app for American teenagers, averaging one hour and eighteen minutes a day, and about one in five of the 1,458 teens Pew Research Center surveyed in late 2025 said they are on TikTok almost constantly. Instagram and Snapchat each drew a lighter 12 percent 'almost constant' figure in the same survey.
The two studies answering the same broad worry are not actually testing the same thing. Whether a five minute clip feels like five minutes or six and a half is a small, mixed result from one lab test. Whether a teenager still believes today connects to next year is the larger, better supported question, and it is also the one Meta's own court appointed auditor will be checking against, wave by wave, for the next decade.
- TikTok
- future time perspective
- Meta settlement
- teen screen time
- Pew Research Center
Sources
- 01Losing Track of Time on TikTok? An Experimental Study of Short Video Users' Time Distortion, Behavioral Sciences / PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- 02Short-form video addiction erodes teens' ability to handle school stress, PsyPostpsypost.org
- 03Teens, Social Media and AI Chatbots 2025, Pew Research Centerpewresearch.org
- 04Meta reaches $17 billion settlement with states in landmark trial over teen social media addiction, PBS NewsHourpbs.org
- 05Teens Who Can't Put Down TikTok and Instagram Are Losing Their Sense of Time, The Wall Street Journalhkg.itiger.com
- 06Dr. Vera Feuer named Chief Clinical Officer, Child Mind Institutechildmind.org
Corrections
No corrections have been made to this article.
About the reporter
Culture, Science & Life Reporter, Trestlewire
I started out writing about science — real lab-coat, peer-reviewed, methods-section science — and I moved into culture coverage because I kept noticing that the internet, not the lab, is often where science actually plays out in people's daily lives now. A study on sleep or attention or habit formation used to sit in a journal for a decade before anyone outside the field read it. Now it shows up in a group chat by Thursday, usually stripped of every caveat that made it interesting in the first place.
Read full bio and all stories →