FDA Approves Dostarlimab for Rectal Cancer. The Complete-Response Rate Is 47 or 68 Percent, Depending on Who Judges
The October 19 accelerated approval covers about 3 percent of locally advanced rectal cancers. It rests on two small trials with no comparison group, and durability is not yet shown.
By Eli Okafor, Health & Wellness
· 3 min read · Updated

Key Takeaways
- •The FDA granted accelerated approval to dostarlimab (Jemperli) on October 19, 2026 for previously untreated stage II or III mismatch repair deficient or MSI-high locally advanced rectal cancer.
- •In AZUR-1, a 154-patient phase 2 trial with no comparison group, 47 percent of 116 centrally reviewed patients had a sustained clinical complete response at 12 months, versus 68 percent by investigator assessment.
- •An earlier Memorial Sloan Kettering trial of 50 patients found 93 percent cancer-free at 12 months, and one recurrence among 27 patients followed three years or longer.
- •The FDA says about 3 percent of locally advanced rectal cancers have this tumor type, and the approval requires further follow-up to show lasting benefit.
On October 19, the FDA granted accelerated approval to dostarlimab (Jemperli, made by GSK) as a stand-alone treatment for adults with previously untreated stage II or III locally advanced rectal cancer whose tumors are mismatch repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high. An FDA-authorized test has to confirm the tumor type first. The agency said the review finished nearly four months ahead of schedule.
What is actually known is narrow. The drug blocks PD-1, a signal tumor cells use to hide from immune cells. The regimen is up to nine doses, one every three weeks, over about six months. The FDA's announcement says almost three-fourths of patients in the supporting trial did not need surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. It does not give the exact count or the denominator behind that figure.
Two trials, two very different numbers
The approval rests on AZUR-1 (NCT05723562), a phase 2 trial with no comparison group that enrolled 154 previously untreated patients. Median follow-up was more than two years. OncLive, citing the approval materials, reports that 116 patients were evaluable by independent central review, and that 47 percent of them had a sustained clinical complete response at 12 months, the trial's primary endpoint. Investigators' own assessment put the rate at 68 percent. The overall response rate was 79 percent by central review and 82 percent by investigators.
47% vs 68%
sustained complete response at 12 months, AZUR-1
Independent central review versus investigator assessment. Same trial, same patients.
The gap matters. A clinical complete response here means no tumor can be found on exam, endoscopy and imaging. It is a judgment call, and reviewers who did not treat the patients were stricter than those who did. Neither number is a survival result. OncLive notes that the incomplete-response and pathologic findings in patients who went on to surgery were suggested by imaging, not confirmed on tissue.
The earlier study that started this
The idea comes from a Memorial Sloan Kettering trial (NCT04165772) of 50 patients with the same tumor type. The FDA's account says no patient had detectable cancer after treatment, and 93 percent stayed cancer-free for at least 12 months. Of 27 patients followed for three years or longer, one had a recurrence, in the same area, and was treated with lymph node surgery.
Andrea Cercek, section head of colorectal cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering, said the results show a "fundamentally different treatment approach" for this biomarker-defined group. Her institution ran the earlier trial, so she is not a neutral reader of the data. GSK's chief scientific officer, Tony Wood, called Jemperli the "first and only" approved immunotherapy for this use. That is a company description, repeated by OncLive from GSK's release.
Who this reaches, and what is not yet known
Published estimates cited by the FDA suggest about 3 percent of locally advanced rectal cancers are mismatch repair deficient or MSI-high. Most rectal cancer patients do not have this tumor type, and nothing in this approval applies to them.
Several things are not established. Longer follow-up is needed to show how long responses last and how often cancer returns, which is the condition attached to an accelerated approval. The coverage reviewed here carries no grade 3 or higher adverse event data and no comparison against standard chemoradiation plus surgery. The FDA lists fatigue, rash, diarrhea and itching as the most common side effects, each reported in at least 15 percent of patients, and warns that the drug can cause the immune system to attack healthy organs, with reactions that can be severe or fatal.
The pattern worth watching is the confirmatory evidence. Single-arm trials of 154 and 50 patients can show that tumors disappear. They cannot show that patients live longer than they would have after surgery.
The bottom line
Solid: the FDA approved dostarlimab on October 19 for stage II or III rectal cancer with mismatch repair deficiency, and many patients in two small single-arm trials avoided surgery. Preliminary: the 12-month complete response rate is 47 percent by independent review, durability is unproven, and no head-to-head comparison exists. This is a conversation for an oncologist.
- dostarlimab
- Jemperli
- rectal cancer
- FDA accelerated approval
- AZUR-1
- immunotherapy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering
Sources
- 01FDA approves immunotherapy that may allow certain patients with rectal cancer to avoid chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, U.S. Food and Drug Administrationfda.gov
- 02FDA Approves Dostarlimab for dMMR/MSI-H Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, OncLiveonclive.com
- 03FDA Approves Dostarlimab in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, CancerNetworkcancernetwork.com
Corrections
No corrections have been made to this article.
About the reporter
Health & Wellness Reporter, Trestlewire
I come from a health-policy and medical-reporting background, and I want to say the same thing up front that I say in nearly every piece I write: I am not a physician, and nothing I write is medical advice. My job is to report on health accurately — to explain what a study found, what it didn't, and what a reader can actually do with that — not to practice medicine from a keyboard.
Read full bio and all stories →